Why Jest and Testing Library Are the Testing Duo Your Code Deserves

js

Why Jest and Testing Library Are the Testing Duo Your Code Deserves

Discover how combining Jest with Testing Library creates resilient, user-focused tests that boost confidence and reduce maintenance.

Dec 29, 2025

Why Jest and Testing Library Are the Testing Duo Your Code Deserves

I’ve been thinking about testing lately. Not the kind that makes you anxious, but the kind that lets you sleep soundly at night. As applications grow from simple scripts to complex interfaces, the old ways of testing—checking if a function returns the right number—just don’t cut it anymore. We need to know if our software actually works for people. That’s what brought me to a powerful duo: Jest and Testing Library. It’s a combination that has fundamentally changed how I build confidence in my code, and I want to share why it might do the same for you.

Think about the last time you used a website or an app. You didn’t call its internal functions; you clicked buttons, filled forms, and read text. Shouldn’t our tests do the same? This is the core idea behind integrating Jest with Testing Library. Jest provides the engine—the test runner, the mocking, the structure. Testing Library provides the philosophy and the tools to interact with your components as a user would. Together, they shift the focus from “does my code execute?” to “does my application behave correctly?”

Let’s start with the setup. It’s straightforward. For a React project, you might install them like this:

npm install --save-dev jest @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-dom

Then, a basic Jest configuration in your package.json or a jest.config.js file gets you running. The magic begins when you write your first test. Instead of checking a component’s internal state, you test what the user sees and does.

Consider a simple button component. The old way might involve testing if its onClick prop is a function. But what does that really tell us? With the integrated approach, we test the actual outcome.

import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'; // Even better for realism

test('button click shows success message', async () => {
  const user = userEvent.setup();
  render(<MyButton />);
  
  // Find the button by its visible text
  const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i });
  
  // Simulate a real user click
  await user.click(button);
  
  // Assert that the expected feedback appears for the user
  expect(screen.getByText('Submission successful!')).toBeInTheDocument();
});

Notice the queries: getByRole, getByText. These are from Testing Library. They encourage you to think about accessible roles and visible content. The assertion .toBeInTheDocument() is a custom matcher from @testing-library/jest-dom that makes the tests more readable. This test will pass as long as the user gets the right feedback, even if you completely rewrite the component’s internal logic tomorrow. How many of your current tests can promise that?

This leads to one of the biggest benefits: durability. Tests written against implementation details are fragile. Change a class name or refactor a state manager, and they break, even if the user experience is identical. Tests written with this integration are resilient. They only break when the actual user-facing behavior breaks, which is exactly when you want a test to fail. This saves countless hours of test maintenance.

But it’s not just about durability. Have you considered how your testing tools can make your application more inclusive? Because Testing Library prioritizes queries like getByRole, it nudges you to build components with proper accessibility attributes. If you can’t find a button by its role, maybe it’s missing a critical aria-label. Your tests become a gentle, constant guide toward better accessibility practices.

Handling asynchronous behavior is where many testing strategies stumble. Users don’t see promises or loading states; they see spinners and then updated content. This integration handles this elegantly. You can wait for elements to appear or disappear, mirroring the user’s patience.

test('loads and displays user data', async () => {
  render(<UserProfile userId="123" />);
  
  // Initially, a loading message should be present
  expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
  
  // Wait for the loading to finish and the data to appear
  const userName = await screen.findByText('John Doe');
  expect(userName).toBeInTheDocument();
  
  // The loading message should now be gone
  expect(screen.queryByText(/loading/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});

The findBy queries are built for async. They wait, just like a user would. This makes testing dynamic applications feel natural.

What about complex forms or multi-step workflows? The integration scales. You can combine user event simulations to walk through entire user journeys. Test that a form can be filled, submitted, and leads to a confirmation page. These aren’t unit tests or full end-to-end tests; they sit in a sweet spot in the middle—fast, reliable, and focused on integrated component behavior.

Mocking is another area where Jest’s capabilities shine alongside Testing Library. Need to test a component that fetches data? Mock the fetch module with Jest, then use Testing Library to assert how the component responds to both success and error states. This allows you to simulate real-world network conditions without hitting an actual API.

The beauty is that this pattern isn’t locked into React. The same principles apply across frameworks. There’s @testing-library/vue for Vue, @testing-library/angular for Angular, and @testing-library/svelte for Svelte. The learning curve for one transfers to the others, making you a more versatile developer.

So, why does this matter to you right now? In a world where user expectations are high and development cycles are fast, we need a safety net that is both robust and sensible. Writing tests that mirror real use makes your test suite an asset, not a burden. It becomes a living documentation of how your application is supposed to work. When a new developer joins the team, they can look at the tests to understand the intended user experience.

I started using this combination out of frustration with brittle tests. I stayed for the confidence it gives me. Every test I write now feels like a direct conversation with the future user of my code. It asks: “Will this work for you?” That’s a powerful question to build into your development process.

If this approach to building reliable software resonates with you, try it on your next component. Start small. Test a button, a form field. Feel the difference. And if you found this perspective helpful, share it with a teammate who’s wrestling with test maintenance. Let me know in the comments what your biggest testing challenge is—perhaps this integrated approach holds a solution for you too.

As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!

101 Books

101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.

Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.

Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!

📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!