I was building a dashboard recently, a typical Next.js project with a few API routes. I kept running into the same old problem. I’d change a field in a database query on the server, forget to update the frontend component, and only discover the bug when a user reported a broken page. My types were lying to me. They were safe on their respective islands—server and client—but the bridge between them was shaky. That’s when I decided to look for a better way to connect my frontend and backend. I wanted my types to be honest across the entire application. This led me to tRPC.
Why should we accept a disconnect between what the server provides and what the client expects? The promise of TypeScript is consistency and safety, but that promise often breaks at the API boundary. Traditional REST or even GraphQL setups require maintaining separate type definitions or schemas. It’s extra work, and it’s error-prone. What if you could just write your server logic and have the types automatically available on the client? That’s the core idea behind tRPC.
Think of tRPC as a way to expose your server functions directly to your client. You define a procedure—a function—on the server with TypeScript. Its input and output types are then instantly known to your frontend code. No code generation step. No manually copying interfaces. You change a return type on the server, and your frontend code will show a TypeScript error until you handle the new shape. It catches integration bugs at compile time, not in production.
How does this fit into Next.js? Perfectly. Next.js already encourages colocating frontend and backend code in the same project. tRPC builds on this by providing a clean, type-safe communication layer. You use your existing Next.js API routes as the host for your tRPC router. The client then talks to this router with full awareness of every available procedure and its exact signature.
Let’s look at how you set this up. First, you create your tRPC router. This is where you define your API surface.
// server/trpc/trpc-router.ts
import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server';
import { z } from 'zod';
const t = initTRPC.create();
export const appRouter = t.router({
getUser: t.procedure
.input(z.object({ userId: z.string() }))
.query(async ({ input }) => {
// Fetch user from your database
const user = await db.user.findUnique({ where: { id: input.userId } });
return user; // TypeScript knows this is a `User | null`
}),
createPost: t.procedure
.input(z.object({ title: z.string().min(1), content: z.string() }))
.mutation(async ({ input }) => {
const post = await db.post.create({ data: input });
return post; // TypeScript knows the shape of `post`
}),
});
export type AppRouter = typeof appRouter;
This router defines two procedures: a query to get a user and a mutation to create a post. Notice we use Zod for runtime validation. This is crucial. tRPC uses the Zod schema to infer the TypeScript type for input, but it also validates the incoming data at runtime. You get both static and dynamic safety.
Next, you need to connect this router to a Next.js API route. This creates the HTTP endpoint.
// pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts
import { createNextApiHandler } from '@trpc/server/adapters/next';
import { appRouter } from '../../../server/trpc/trpc-router';
export default createNextApiHandler({
router: appRouter,
createContext: () => ({}),
});
With the server running, the types are now ready to be used on the client. This is where the magic becomes visible. You create a type-safe tRPC client.
// utils/trpc.ts
import { createTRPCNext } from '@trpc/next';
import type { AppRouter } from '../server/trpc/trpc-router';
export const trpc = createTRPCNext<AppRouter>({
config() {
return {
url: '/api/trpc',
};
},
});
Now, in any React component, you can use this client. Your IDE will provide autocomplete for .getUser or .createPost. It will know the exact shape of the input required and the data returned.
// components/UserProfile.tsx
import { trpc } from '../utils/trpc';
function UserProfile({ userId }: { userId: string }) {
// `user` is fully typed. TypeScript knows it's `User | null | undefined`.
const { data: user, isLoading } = trpc.getUser.useQuery({ userId });
if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>;
if (!user) return <div>User not found</div>;
// Safe to access `user.name` and `user.email` - TypeScript guarantees they exist.
return (
<div>
<h1>{user.name}</h1>
<p>{user.email}</p>
</div>
);
}
Can you see the benefit? There is no any type here. There’s no manual interface IUserResponse. The type flows directly from the database query, through the server procedure, and into the React component. If I later change the database model to remove the email field, the TypeScript error will appear first in this component, guiding me to fix the UI before I even run the code.
This approach shines for applications where the same team owns the frontend and backend. It removes a whole category of communication errors. You’re not debating over API spec documents; the code is the contract. For building internal tools, admin panels, or full-stack applications where agility and reliability are key, this integration is a game-changer.
It’s not a silver bullet, of course. If you need to support third-party clients or a mobile app with a separate codebase, the tight coupling of tRPC can be a limitation. Those clients would need to be in TypeScript and part of your monorepo to get the full benefit. For a standard web application built with Next.js, however, it’s an incredibly efficient model.
The developer experience is profoundly smooth. You spend less time writing boilerplate type definitions and more time building features. You spend less time debugging mismatched data and more time confident that your system works as a cohesive whole. The feedback loop is immediate and enforced by the compiler.
I’ve found that adopting tRPC with Next.js changes how you think about API development. The boundary between client and server becomes a detail, not a barrier. You start writing your application as a single, type-safe unit. It reduces mental overhead and lets you focus on solving real problems for your users.
Have you ever spent time tracking down a bug that was just a misspelled property name in an API response? With this setup, that class of error simply disappears. Your editor tells you the property doesn’t exist as you type. It turns runtime uncertainty into compile-time certainty.
Give it a try in your next project. Start by converting a single API route. Feel the difference when your autocomplete suggests the correct data paths and your compiler guards against breaking changes. It makes the process of building web applications feel solid and predictable.
If you’ve struggled with keeping your frontend and backend in sync, this might be the solution you’ve been looking for. It brings the full power of TypeScript to the network layer. Try it out, and see how many potential bugs you catch before they ever reach a browser. What feature would you build first with this level of type safety?
I’d love to hear about your experiences with type-safe APIs. Did this approach solve a problem for you? Do you have a different method? Share your thoughts in the comments below—let’s discuss. If you found this guide helpful, please like and share it with other developers who might be wrestling with the same challenges.
As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!
101 Books
101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.
Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.
Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!
📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!
Our Creations
Be sure to check out our creations:
Investor Central | Investor Central Spanish | Investor Central German | Smart Living | Epochs & Echoes | Puzzling Mysteries | Hindutva | Elite Dev | JS Schools
We are on Medium
Tech Koala Insights | Epochs & Echoes World | Investor Central Medium | Puzzling Mysteries Medium | Science & Epochs Medium | Modern Hindutva