I was building an API recently when I hit a familiar wall. My TypeScript interfaces gave me confidence during development, but they vanished at runtime. A user could send a string where a number should be, and my beautifully typed code would break. That’s when I decided to look for a better way. I wanted the safety of types and the certainty of validation. This is why combining TypeScript with Joi became my focus. It’s a practical solution to a very real problem. Let’s talk about how it works.
Think of TypeScript as your blueprint. It defines what your data structure should look like while you write code. Joi is the inspector. It checks the actual data coming in, like from an API request, against the rules you set. Using them together means your blueprint and your inspection checklist are always in sync. You define your data shape once, and it works everywhere.
Why does this matter? Because data from the outside world is messy. A user might forget a required field. A third-party service might send a date in the wrong format. TypeScript can’t catch these runtime errors. It only checks your code as you write it. Joi steps in to validate the live data, ensuring it matches your expectations before your business logic even touches it.
So, how do you start? First, you define a schema with Joi. This schema describes your data’s rules: what fields are required, what type they should be, and any extra conditions. Here’s a basic example for validating a user registration.
import Joi from 'joi';
const userRegistrationSchema = Joi.object({
username: Joi.string().alphanum().min(3).max(30).required(),
email: Joi.string().email().required(),
age: Joi.number().integer().min(18).optional(),
password: Joi.string().pattern(new RegExp('^[a-zA-Z0-9]{8,30}$')).required()
});This schema ensures a username is an alphanumeric string, the email is valid, and the password matches a specific pattern. But where do the TypeScript types come from? This is the crucial link. You can derive a TypeScript type directly from this Joi schema. This keeps everything consistent.
Have you ever updated a type but forgotten to update the validation logic? This approach solves that. You maintain one source of truth. Libraries like joi-to-typescript can help generate types automatically. The idea is simple: write your validation rules once, and get both runtime checking and compile-time typing.
Let’s look at how you’d use this in an Express.js route. Without validation, you’re hoping the request body is correct. With Joi and TypeScript, you can be sure.
import { Request, Response } from 'express';
app.post('/register', async (req: Request, res: Response) => {
// Validate the incoming request body
const { error, value } = userRegistrationSchema.validate(req.body);
if (error) {
return res.status(400).json({ error: error.details[0].message });
}
// At this point, 'value' is guaranteed to match our schema.
// We can now safely use it with full type confidence.
const newUser: UserRegistrationData = value;
// ... proceed with creating the user
res.status(201).json({ message: 'User created', user: newUser });
});After validation passes, the value object conforms to the shape defined by the schema. You can now cast it to a TypeScript type or, even better, have it inferred automatically. This creates a safe bridge between the untrusted external data and your trusted internal application logic.
What about more complex rules? Joi excels here. You can set up conditional validation, like making a field required only if another field has a specific value. This is something TypeScript’s type system can’t express on its own. For instance, if a user selects a “business” account type, you might require a companyName field.
const accountSchema = Joi.object({
accountType: Joi.string().valid('personal', 'business').required(),
companyName: Joi.when('accountType', {
is: 'business',
then: Joi.string().required(),
otherwise: Joi.string().optional()
})
});The generated TypeScript type would correctly reflect that companyName is optional for ‘personal’ accounts but required for ‘business’. This keeps your types accurate and your validation robust. It prevents invalid state from ever entering your system.
The developer experience improves dramatically. Instead of generic “Bad Request” errors, Joi gives you specific, helpful messages. “password must be at least 8 characters long” is much more useful for both debugging and providing feedback to an API client. This clarity saves time and frustration.
Is there a performance cost? There is a small one, as with any validation layer. However, the cost of not validating—allowing corrupt or malicious data to flow into your database or core logic—is almost always far greater. It’s a trade-off that provides immense stability and security.
In my projects, this pattern has reduced bugs significantly. It creates a clear contract for data at the edge of the application. My team spends less time debugging strange data issues and more time building features. The confidence that the data inside the system is valid is priceless.
Setting this up does require an initial investment. You need to define your schemas thoughtfully. But this investment pays off quickly. It becomes the foundation for reliable APIs and services. Every piece of data is checked, and every variable in your code has a known, safe type.
I encourage you to try this in your next project. Start with a single endpoint. Define a Joi schema, generate or write a matching TypeScript interface, and validate your incoming requests. You’ll immediately feel the difference. The gap between development and runtime will start to close.
This approach isn’t just about preventing errors. It’s about building a predictable, resilient system. It allows you to move faster because you have greater trust in your own code. You know that if the data passes validation, it’s safe to use. That peace of mind is what good engineering provides.
What challenges have you faced with runtime data? Could a single source of truth for types and validation help? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. If you found this walkthrough helpful, please consider sharing it with other developers who might be wrestling with the same problem. Let’s build more robust software, together.
As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!
101 Books
101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.
Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.
Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!
📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!
Our Creations
Be sure to check out our creations:
Investor Central | Investor Central Spanish | Investor Central German | Smart Living | Epochs & Echoes | Puzzling Mysteries | Hindutva | Elite Dev | JS Schools
We are on Medium
Tech Koala Insights | Epochs & Echoes World | Investor Central Medium | Puzzling Mysteries Medium | Science & Epochs Medium | Modern Hindutva
