I’ve been thinking about a problem that keeps coming up in my projects. TypeScript makes my code feel safe and predictable during development. It catches my mistakes before they become bugs. But then I deploy the application, and it starts talking to the outside world. An API sends a payload. A user submits a form. Suddenly, all those beautiful type guarantees vanish. TypeScript’s checks are gone, compiled away into plain JavaScript. The data coming in is a complete unknown. This gap between compile-time safety and runtime reality is where things break. It’s why I started combining TypeScript with Joi.
Think about it. You define a perfect User interface in TypeScript. Your whole codebase relies on it. But what happens when the database returns a field as a string that you typed as a number? Or an API omits a property you marked as required? TypeScript can’t help you there. Your application crashes or, worse, behaves unpredictably. This is the core issue. We need a guard at the door, something that checks every piece of data as it enters our system. That guard is runtime validation.
Joi is that guard. It’s a library for describing the shape and rules of your data using schemas. You tell Joi, “This object must have an email field that’s a string and looks like an email, and an age field that’s a number between 18 and 120.” Then, at runtime, you can pass any data to Joi and ask, “Does this match my schema?” It will check every rule and tell you yes or no. It’s incredibly thorough. But for a long time, using Joi meant maintaining two separate truths: the Joi schema in your validation logic and the TypeScript interface in your type definitions. Keeping them in sync was manual, tedious, and error-prone.
What if you could define the truth once? This is the powerful idea behind integrating the two. You write your validation rules in Joi, and from that single source, you generate the TypeScript types your application needs. Your validation logic and your type definitions can never drift apart because they come from the same place. The process is straightforward. You start by building your schema with Joi’s expressive API.
import Joi from 'joi';
const userRegistrationSchema = Joi.object({
email: Joi.string().email().required(),
password: Joi.string().min(8).required(),
age: Joi.number().integer().min(18).max(120).required(),
preferences: Joi.object({
newsletter: Joi.boolean().default(true),
theme: Joi.string().valid('light', 'dark', 'auto').default('auto')
}).optional()
});This schema does more than a TypeScript interface ever could. It doesn’t just say age is a number. It says it must be an integer between 18 and 120. It provides default values. It defines allowed strings for the theme field. This is runtime business logic. The next step is to create a TypeScript type from this schema. You can do this manually by mirroring the structure, but that’s the old, fragile way. Instead, use a helper library like joi-to-typescript or define a type inference.
import { Schema } from 'joi';
// Infer a TypeScript type from a Joi schema
type InferType<T extends Schema> = T extends Joi.ObjectSchema<infer P> ? P : never;
type UserRegistrationData = InferType<typeof userRegistrationSchema>;
// This type is now: {
// email: string;
// password: string;
// age: number;
// preferences?: { newsletter?: boolean; theme?: 'light' | 'dark' | 'auto' };
// }Now, UserRegistrationData is a TypeScript type that perfectly matches your Joi schema. Use this type in your function signatures, and you get full IDE autocompletion and type checking. But remember, this type is just a prediction. It’s what you expect. The real validation happens at runtime with the Joi schema. Here’s how you use them together in an Express route handler.
import express, { Request, Response } from 'express';
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.post('/register', (req: Request, res: Response) => {
// 1. Validate the runtime data against the schema
const { error, value } = userRegistrationSchema.validate(req.body, { abortEarly: false });
if (error) {
// Send detailed validation errors back to the client
return res.status(400).json({ error: error.details });
}
// 2. 'value' is now guaranteed to match the UserRegistrationData type
const validatedData: UserRegistrationData = value;
// 3. Proceed with business logic safely
console.log(`Registering user with email: ${validatedData.email}`);
// Your database call or service logic here...
res.status(201).json({ message: 'User registered', userId: 123 });
});See the flow? The request body (req.body) is any from TypeScript’s perspective. It’s untrusted. We pass it to Joi.validate(). Joi acts as the bouncer, checking IDs. If the data is invalid, we reject it immediately with a clear error. If it’s valid, the value returned is now data we can trust. By assigning it to validatedData with the UserRegistrationData type, we bring TypeScript back into the picture. From this point on in our function, we have data that is both statically typed and runtime-validated. It’s the best of both worlds.
This pattern transforms how you handle data. It makes your API endpoints robust and self-documenting. The schema is the contract. Have you considered what happens when validation rules need to change? With this setup, you change the Joi schema in one place. The TypeScript types update automatically (via your inference or build script), and your entire codebase immediately knows what the new contract looks like. It catches places where you might be using the old field shape.
The integration goes beyond simple objects. Joi can handle arrays, conditional validation, and complex references. What if a discount code is only required if a wantsPromotions field is true? Joi can model that with .when(). Generating a TypeScript type for that conditional structure is more complex, but it reinforces the principle: your validation logic is the single source of truth. Your types are a derived, compile-time representation of that truth.
So, why did this topic come to my mind? Because I was tired of the “it works on my machine” syndrome caused by unvalidated runtime data. I was tired of bugs that slipped through because my types were a hopeful guess, not a guaranteed contract. Combining TypeScript and Joi closed that loop. It brought discipline to the chaotic frontier where my application meets the real world. It’s not just about preventing errors; it’s about creating a system where the data flow is clear, predictable, and secure from the very first point of contact.
Start by adding Joi to your next TypeScript backend project. Write a schema for your next API endpoint. Feel the confidence that comes from knowing exactly what data you’re working with. It turns one of the most fragile parts of your application into one of the strongest. If you’ve struggled with unexpected data shapes or type mismatches from APIs, this approach can change your workflow. Give it a try. If you found this breakdown helpful, or have your own tips for type-safe validation, let me know in the comments. Sharing these ideas helps everyone build more reliable software.
As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!
101 Books
101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.
Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.
Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!
📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!
Our Creations
Be sure to check out our creations:
Investor Central | Investor Central Spanish | Investor Central German | Smart Living | Epochs & Echoes | Puzzling Mysteries | Hindutva | Elite Dev | JS Schools
We are on Medium
Tech Koala Insights | Epochs & Echoes World | Investor Central Medium | Puzzling Mysteries Medium | Science & Epochs Medium | Modern Hindutva
