I’ve been thinking about testing lately. Not just any testing, but the kind that doesn’t feel like a chore. The kind that tells a clear story about what your application should do, a story everyone on the team can read. That’s what led me to explore bringing together two powerful tools: Cypress and Cucumber. If you’ve ever felt your tests are too technical for non-developers to understand, or that your team’s requirements get lost in translation, this approach might change your perspective.
Cypress is a testing framework I’ve come to rely on for web applications. It runs directly in the browser, which means tests execute in the same environment as your users. There’s no more guessing about timing issues; Cypress automatically waits for elements to appear. You get real-time feedback as you write tests, seeing them run instantly. It feels less like writing code and more like having a conversation with your application.
Then there’s Cucumber. This tool introduces a simple, structured language called Gherkin. With Gherkin, you write test scenarios in plain English sentences. These sentences follow a basic pattern: Given some context, When an action occurs, Then a specific outcome should happen. This format is deceptively simple. It forces you to describe behavior, not implementation details. A product manager, a designer, and a developer can all look at the same feature file and agree on what “success” means.
So, what happens when you combine them? You get a testing strategy that speaks two languages. The business logic is written in clear, human-friendly Gherkin. The technical execution—clicking buttons, filling forms, checking results—is handled by the robust power of Cypress. This creates a bridge. It connects the “what” of a feature with the “how” of its validation. Have you ever had a test fail and spent time figuring out what it was actually trying to prove? This combination aims to solve that.
Setting this up is straightforward. You start by adding the necessary packages to your JavaScript project.
npm install cypress @badeball/cypress-cucumber-preprocessorNext, you need to configure Cypress to understand Cucumber’s .feature files. This involves updating the cypress.config.js file and adding a plugin configuration. The preprocessor acts as a translator, telling Cypress how to read the Gherkin syntax and link it to your test code.
With the setup done, you can write your first feature file. This is where the clarity begins. Let’s say we’re testing a login page. Instead of jumping straight into CSS selectors and assertions, we describe the scenario.
# features/login.feature
Feature: User Login
As a registered user
I want to log into my account
So that I can access my dashboard
Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials
Given I am on the login page
When I enter a valid username and password
And I click the login button
Then I should be redirected to my dashboard
And I should see a welcome messageNotice how this reads like a specification document. Anyone can understand it. This file lives alongside your code and serves as active, executable documentation. If the login flow changes, this file must be updated, which means your documentation is never out of date.
But these plain-language steps need instructions. That’s where step definitions come in. These are JavaScript files where you write the Cypress code that powers each Gherkin step. This is where you translate “I am on the login page” into a browser command.
// cypress/e2e/step_definitions/login_steps.js
import { Given, When, Then } from "@badeball/cypress-cucumber-preprocessor";
Given("I am on the login page", () => {
cy.visit("/login");
});
When("I enter a valid username and password", () => {
cy.get('[data-cy="username"]').type("testuser");
cy.get('[data-cy="password"]').type("securepass123");
});
When("I click the login button", () => {
cy.get('[data-cy="login-submit"]').click();
});
Then("I should be redirected to my dashboard", () => {
cy.url().should("include", "/dashboard");
});
Then("I should see a welcome message", () => {
cy.get('[data-cy="welcome-banner"]').should("contain.text", "Welcome back");
});The beauty here is the separation. The what (the feature file) is distinct from the how (the step definitions). A business analyst can suggest a new scenario by adding a few lines to the .feature file. A developer can then implement the steps, perhaps even reusing existing ones. This modularity makes tests easier to maintain and expand over time. Can you see how this creates a shared vocabulary for your team?
This approach shines in agile environments. During planning sessions, you can draft feature files together. These drafts become both the acceptance criteria and the blueprint for the test. When a developer finishes the feature, the test is already defined. Running it confirms the work meets the agreed-upon behavior. It turns testing from a final gate into an integral part of the development conversation.
Of course, it’s not a magic solution. Writing good Gherkin requires discipline. Scenarios should be focused and avoid too much detail. The goal is to test behavior, not every single click. Step definitions should be kept clean and reusable. You might find yourself creating a library of common steps, like “I am on the homepage” or “I see a success notification,” which can be used across many different features.
The result is a test suite that is more than just a safety net. It becomes a source of truth about your application’s capabilities. New team members can read the feature files to understand how the system works. When a test fails, the error message points to a clear, plain-language scenario, making debugging faster. It aligns the entire team, from concept to code to validation.
I encourage you to try this integration on a small feature in your current project. Start with one user flow. Write the Gherkin first, as if you were explaining it to a colleague. Then, fill in the steps with Cypress. You might find that the process of writing the test clarifies the requirement itself. If this approach helps you build better-understood and more reliable software, share your experience below. Let me know in the comments what challenges you face with testing, or if this combination works for your team. Don’t forget to like and share this if you found it useful
As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!
101 Books
101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.
Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.
Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!
📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!
Our Creations
Be sure to check out our creations:
Investor Central | Investor Central Spanish | Investor Central German | Smart Living | Epochs & Echoes | Puzzling Mysteries | Hindutva | Elite Dev | JS Schools
We are on Medium
Tech Koala Insights | Epochs & Echoes World | Investor Central Medium | Puzzling Mysteries Medium | Science & Epochs Medium | Modern Hindutva
